|
|
|
 
Michigan
Commissioner: No Whimsy Behind Rule to Ban Credit
Scoring
By Dennis Kelly, senior associate editor, BestWeek
LANSING, Mich. June 17, 2004 (BestWire) - Michigan's
insurance regulator said her quest to ban insurers' use
of credit information is not being done on a whim, but
is based on a body of state-specific research, including
information gathered by her predecessor.
"We found that credit scores are fraught with errors,"
said Linda Watters, commissioner of Michigan's Office of
Financial and Insurance Services. Some studies show
upwards of 70% of credit reports have errors, she said,
with about 29% being "so egregiously" incorrect that it
hurts insurance rates paid by consumers.
"There's no uniformity. We understand insurers apply it
differently," Watters said, "and there's no
transparency."
The proposed ban would apply to homeowners and
automobile insurance and come in the form of a rule, as
opposed to legislation. Watters estimates consumers will
see rate decreases ranging from 10% to 45%, depending on
where they live. Insurers would be required to reduce
their base rate under the proposal.
During a recent conversation, she repeatedly referred to
two elements regarding the proposed ban--the insurance
company data that's been collected over the past couple
of years and the benefit to consumers.
As the insurance industry has fought state-to-state
battles over the past few years to retain use of
credit-based insurance scoring as an underwriting tool,
it points to its own data showing a correlation between
low credit-based scores and a higher claims-filing
frequency.
Walters said one can always find studies that will
support a position. "What we found from pure information
is base rates increased significantly since the advent
of credit scoring," she said.
Michigan is a "file-and-use" state, meaning insurers
don't need prior approval from the commissioner to use a
rate. Since 1999, when credit-based insurance scoring
began its widespread use in Michigan, "we have seen base
rates increase exponentially," Watters said. "So we know
the base rates have been impacted by credit scoring.
That's why we're calling for a reduction of base rates."
A 384% jump in consumer complaints prompted Watters to
launch an investigation into rising homeowners and auto
rates in January. Insurers were called on to provide
claims experience for 2001 and 2002; repair-cost
information, as required by state law, and written
exposure, written premium, incurred losses and incurred
claims for 2001 and 2002.
After seven months of study in 2002, Michigan's former
insurance commissioner Frank Fitzgerald decided not to
ban insurers' use of credit-based insurance scoring, but
did seek to require insurers to make public the formulas
and factors used to determine those scores. Michigan law
allows automobile and homeowners writers to use credit
information only to provide discounts to policyholders (BestWire,
Dec. 16, 2002).
Along with the data she requested, Watters said she is
also working with information gathered from Fitzgerald's
survey. She also has per-company information on the
discount given policyholders through the use of credit
scoring.
Her conclusion from the data is there isn't enough of an
overall benefit from the credit scoring-based discounts
to offset the ill effects caused to rate-paying
consumers. "Absolutely," she said.
But Watters still has a use for those discounts.
"Insurers will be required to reduce the base rate by
the weighted average of the credit-scoring discount,"
she said.
While testifying at recent state Senate committee
hearings, Watters was asked if some policyholders who
get discounts because of good credit-based scores would
see rates go up.
"If consumers experience a change in their rates after
Jan. 1, 2005, like anyone else, we encourage them to
shop around for the best rate," Watters said. During the
hearing, one senator noted accurately, she said, that
the free market system will kick in, giving consumers
options because the rating factors will be tied to risk.
Insurers see an insurance-scoring bill in the
Legislature, HB 5803, as the better alternative because
it's based on a model developed by the National
Association of Insurance Legislators that imposes some
restrictions they say they can live with, while at the
same time providing consumer protections.
Watters said she has worked for "many months" with
legislators to try to incorporate a number of her
pro-consumer concerns into a bill, but it was determined
that they weren't going to make it in the bill--thus the
rulemaking route. A series of four public hearings will
be held between July 19-28 at various locations so all
stakeholders can comment on the proposed rule, she said.
The objective is to have it the rule ready in the fall
so it would take effect on policies beginning Jan. 1,
2005. "I've made several speeches to industry
associations and all along I've been very clear in
looking at all my options. A ban has always been an
option. We didn't just do this on a whim."
The average premium for Detroit-area drivers with clean
driving records for a midsize, midpriced sedan was
$4,945 a year, including comprehensive, collision,
bodily injury, property damage and uninsured motorist
coverage, according to a study by consulting firm
Runzheimer International. At the other end is Nashville,
Tenn., with the lowest average annual premiums, at $978.
Runzheimer's results, released in March, didn't entirely
mirror the geographical spread of a study done by the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners the
previous July. NAIC's study didn't include Michigan
among the 10 states with the highest auto rates (BestWire,
March 5, 2004).
Banning the use of credit information in insurance
underwriting homeowners and automobile coverage is the
first step in Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm's plan to
address rising insurance costs in her state (BestWire,
April 29, 2004). Granholm appointed Watters in April
2003 to replace Fitzgerald, who had resigned two months
prior.
Since 1999, when insurance scoring began to be widely
used in Michigan, average automobile insurance base
rates increased between 45% and 90%, depending on
location, Granholm said, citing information from the
OFIS Buyers Guide to Auto Insurance.
The top five writers of all private passenger auto in
Michigan in 2002, according to A.M. Best Co. state/line
data, were: Auto Club Group, with 20.10% market share;
State Farm Group, with 18.72%; Allmerica Financial
Property & Casualty Cos., with 8.58%; Auto-Owners
Insurance Group, with 8.30%, and Allstate Insurance
Group, with 8.21% (BestWire, April 29, 2004).
Michigan's top five writers of homeowners multiperil in
2002 were: State Farm Group, 18.59%; Auto-Owners
Insurance Group, with 13.11; Auto Club Group, with
11.59%; Allmerica Financial Property & Casualty Cos.,
with 10.39%, and Allstate Insurance Group, with 10.37% (BestWire,
April 29, 2004).
/bigger>/bigger>/fontfamily>
|
|