|
|

TOPEKA, Kan. 03/10/2003 (BestWire)-A Kansas bill with minimal
restrictions on insurers' use of credit-based insurance scoring has passed
unanimously in the state Senate, but another, more restrictive bill remains, according
to an industry group.
Senate Bill 144 would allow insurance scoring if insurers don't use
it as the sole criterion in underwriting and rating, the National Association
of Independent Insurers said. Under the bill, policyholders could
request that their scores be rerun once a year. When the policyholder requests
the rerun, the information could only be used to the policyholder's advantage.
The bill also would require insurers to rerun scores at least every
three years, depending on their underwriting process. When the insurer
runs the score, the information could be used to increase or decrease rates,
NAII said.
The bill, now before the House, is a hybrid of recommendations from
the legislative task force on insurance scoring, a model act developed
by the National Conference of Insurance Legislators, the insurance
commissioner, agents and insurers, according to the NAII. The House is to hold a
hearing on the bill March 13, according to the Kansas Legislature's Web site.
Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger supports Senate Bill 144, she
said in a statement.
Another bill, Senate Bill 176, would prohibit insurance scoring in
the renewal of insurance and as the sole basis for underwriting and
rating, but it hasn't left the Senate yet. "With the passage of SB 144, we hope
that SB 176 will not advance," Ann Weber, counsel for the NAII, said in a
statement.
Credit-based insurance scoring is being discussed in several states,
and so far Maryland has the strictest law, banning its use entirely in
connection with homeowners insurance. Nevada legislators are discussing a bill
that would ban the use of insurance scores in underwriting and rating.
Meanwhile, a study by the Alaska Department of Insurance has questioned the
insurance industry's claims that scores are effective, concluding that
higher-income areas might be less impacted by the use of the scores (BestWire,
March 5, 2003).
During 2002, the controversy surrounding credit-based insurance
scoring shifted--from whether or not such scores correlate to higher risk of insurance losses to how to use the scores without being accused of discrimination. Many states have held public discussions regarding
the use of insurance scores, which are gleaned from credit reports and don't
refer to age, race or any information considered as inappropriate factors in
an underwriting review (Best's Review, January 2003).
(By Marie Suszynski, associate editor, BestWeek: Marie.Suszynski@ambest.com)
CREDIT SCORING
LEGISLATION APPROVED
On April 17, Governor Kathleen Sebelius signed HB 2071-giving the
Kansas Insurance Department the authority to regulate credit-based
insurance scoring. The law becomes effective January 1, 2004 and
will:
Apply only to car and homeowner's insurance. No longer allow insurance
scoring to be used as a sole factor in determining an insurance risk
(it can be used that way now). Require a change in a traditional
underwriting factor before credit can be used against a consumer.
Require insurance companies to review the scoring process every 36
months. Require insurance companies to provide a consumer appeals
process that is approved by the Kansas Insurance Department. Require
insurance companies to file their methodology with KID. The Department
is charged with making sure the methodology does not unfairly
discriminate against a consumer.
View
Results of the Credit Scoring Survey Conducted by the Kansas Insurance
Department
Praeger Named to NAIC Post
Sandy
Praeger to Chair Health Insurance Task Force
Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger has been appointed Chair
of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners'
Health Insurance Task Force. The mission of task force is to respond
to inquiries from Congress, the White House and executive departments
concerning the policy, regulatory and implementation implications of
federal health care legislation.
Praeger Calls For Consumer Protection Bill Insurance Commissioner
Wants to Regulate Credit Scoring
Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger is urging Kansas lawmakers
to adopt a bill that would regulate the use of credit-based insurance
scoring. A task force appointed by the legislature recently reviewed
the issue. "Today Kansas consumers have no state protections from the
misuse of credit-based insurance scoring," said Praeger. "There has
been too much confusion and suspicion regarding this practice.
Consumers need assurance that the rates they are paying are fair."
Credit Scoring Task Force
In May 2002, the Kansas Legislature approved Senate Concurrent
Resolution No. 1623, which provided for the formation of a Task Force
to study the desirability of regulation of insurance credit scoring
practices.
It was the consensus of the Task Force that neither unfettered use of
credit-based insurance scoring nor total ban of credit-based insurance
scoring is an appropriate remedy or outcome. The Task Force concluded
after deliberations that Kansas law does not provide specific
statutory oversight of the usage of credit based insurance scores, and
that Kansas consumers need appropriate knowledge of the use of credit
scores and how it impacts their insurance.
The Task Force also recommends the following components be considered
in any legislative language proposed.Read
report.
The fifteen member Task Force was formed by the Kansas Legislature to
study the desirability of regulation of credit-based insurance scoring
practices. The Task Force Report represents the views of the fifteen
members and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the
Kansas Insurance Department.
Kansas Insurance Department
420 SW 9th Street
Topeka, Kansas 66612-1678
1-800-432-2484
Kansas Commish Wants to Regulate
Credit Scoring
February 11, 2003
Kansas consumers should be told how credit scoring affects their insurance
rates, Kansas Insurance Department Commissioner Sandy Praeger said in a
written statement.
Kansas now has "no specific statutory oversight of the use of credit-based
insurance scores," Praeger said, meaning there are no restrictions on how
credit scoring may be used by insurers in setting rates or deciding to
deny, cancel or non-renew policies.
A task force created by the Kansas legislature last year agreed that there
should be some limits placed on credit scoring, but that it should be not
be banned entirely.
The Kansas Insurance Department has introduced legislation based on a
model bill created by the National Conference of Insurance Legislators
that was agreed to by insurers, agents and legislators.
The bill, which applies only to personal and not commercial lines,
prohibits insurers from setting rates, denying, canceling, or non-renewing
a policy based solely the credit score — or lack of credit history — and
requires insurers to rescore a person's credit upon the applicant's
request.
The bill also requires insurers or their agents to inform applicants that
their credit report will be reviewed and explain any adverse action taken
based on the applicant's credit score.
A.M. Best
Kansas Senate Passes Insurance-Scoring Bill
TOPEKA, Kan. 03/10/2003 (BestWire)-A Kansas bill with minimal restrictions
on
insurers' use of credit-based insurance scoring has passed unanimously in
the
state Senate, but another, more restrictive bill remains, according to an
industry group.
Senate Bill 144 would allow insurance scoring if insurers don't use it as
the
sole criterion in underwriting and rating, the National Association of
Independent Insurers said. Under the bill, policyholders could request
that
their scores be rerun once a year. When the policyholder requests the
rerun,
the information could only be used to the policyholder's advantage.
The bill also would require insurers to rerun scores at least every three
years, depending on their underwriting process. When the insurer runs the
score, the information could be used to increase or decrease rates, NAII
said.
The bill, now before the House, is a hybrid of recommendations from the
legislative task force on insurance scoring, a model act developed by the
National Conference of Insurance Legislators, the insurance commissioner,
agents and insurers, according to the NAII. The House is to hold a hearing
on
the bill March 13, according to the Kansas Legislature's Web site.
Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger supports Senate Bill 144, she said in
a
statement.
Another bill, Senate Bill 176, would prohibit insurance scoring in the
renewal of insurance and as the sole basis for underwriting and rating,
but
it hasn't left the Senate yet. "With the passage of SB 144, we hope that
SB
176 will not advance," Ann Weber, counsel for the NAII, said in a
statement.
Credit-based insurance scoring is being discussed in several states, and
so
far Maryland has the strictest law, banning its use entirely in connection
with homeowners insurance. Nevada legislators are discussing a bill that
would ban the use of insurance scores in underwriting and rating.
Meanwhile,
a study by the Alaska Department of Insurance has questioned the insurance
industry's claims that scores are effective, concluding that higher-income
areas might be less impacted by the use of the scores (BestWire, March 5,
2003).
During 2002, the controversy surrounding credit-based insurance scoring
shifted--from whether or not such scores correlate to higher risk of
insurance losses to how to use the scores without being accused of
discrimination. Many states have held public discussions regarding the use
of
insurance scores, which are gleaned from credit reports and don't refer to
age, race or any information considered as inappropriate factors in an
underwriting review (Best's Review, January 2003).
(By Marie Suszynski, associate editor, BestWeek:
Marie.Suszynski@ambest.com)
Survey: Credit Scoring A Rate
Factor
NU Online News Service, March 31, 9:40 a.m. EST—In a new online poll
conducted by the Kansas insurance department, more than half of Kansans
participating in the survey said credit scoring was a factor in their
increased auto and homeowners insurance rates.
Among 524 individuals who have responded so far, 457 people, or nearly 90
percent, said their auto and homeowners insurance rates have gone up in
the past year, and 269 respondents said they were told by agents credit
scoring was a factor in their insurance premium hikes.
The poll also found that 194 respondents did not receive any explanation
for rate changes, while 153 people indicated they did receive explanation
from their agents after the inquiry.
"We know that some Kansans are seeing rate increases, while others are
seeing decreases because of credit scoring," said Kansas Insurance
Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who organized the online survey. Ms. Praeger
said she supports legislation that would allow her office to regulate the
practice of credit scoring by insurers.
"Right now, there's no regulatory authority over this practice, and Kansas
consumers deserve to know how their rates are determined. We need a clear
picture of these trends so that legislators can understand how credit
scoring is affecting real people, and then adopt appropriate regulatory
legislation," Ms. Praeger said.
"This survey should shine some much-needed light on the matter."
Full results from the Kansas Insurance Department's online survey can be
found at
www.ksinsurance.org/creditscoring/credit_results.php
Kansas Governor Expected to Sign
Insurance-Scoring Bill
TOPEKA, Kan. April 08 (BestWire) - The Kansas Legislature has passed a new
credit-based insurance scoring act that allows insurers to use credit
ratings in underwriting, but the bill leaves out a recommendation from the
National Conference of Insurance Legislators.
House Bill 2071 has been approved by the House and the Senate and is
expected to be signed by Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, said Jeff Brewer,
spokesman for the National Association of Independent Insurers.
Under the bill, insurers would be prohibited from taking adverse action,
denying or refusing to quote or renew a policy solely on the basis of
credit information, Brewer said. Rather, insurers would be required to
treat no credit history as a neutral factor or exclude it as a factor.
Although those provisions follow NCOIL's recommendations to deal with a
"no hit," or a situation in which there's no credit history, the bill
leaves out a third option. In addition to treating a "no-hit" as a neutral
factor or by excluding it as a factor, NCOIL said insurers also could use
it in underwriting or rating if they can demonstrate to the insurance
commissioner that the "no-hit" carries a certain amount of risk, Brewer
said.
The bill would also give policyholders the right to request that their
scores be rerun once a year, but the information can only be used to lower
the premium. Insurers also would be required to rerun scores at least
every three years, depending on their underwriting process, and would be
permitted to use the information to increase or decrease rates.
In addition, H.B. 2071 requires state Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger
to report to the Legislature by Jan. 26, 2005, on the use of credit and
the implementation of the act, Brewer said. There was an attempt to amend
the bill to require a more extensive study by the commissioner, but the
amendment was removed, he said. It would have required collecting
information on race and income, which is information insurers don't
collect.
"As an overall approach, this is workable," Brewer said, noting that the
bill recognizes the value of insurance scoring as an underwriting and
rating tool and protects scoring models as trade secrets.
Kansas had been facing a Senate bill that would have prohibited insurance
scoring in renewals and as the sole basis for underwriting and rating (BestWire,
March 10, 2003).
Senate Bill 144, which passed in the Senate and established how often
insurers should run a credit rating, was rolled into House Bill 2071.
Credit-based insurance scoring is being discussed in several states. So
far, Maryland has the strictest law, banning its use entirely in
connection with homeowners insurance (BestWire, March 5, 2003).
(By Marie Suszynski, associate editor, BestWeek: Marie.Suszynski@ambest.com)
BN-NJ-04-08-2003 1451 ET #
|
|